NASA Fakes Moon Landing!
|
|
|
Heroic
images or NASA fraud? At last we have the conclusive proof! The
image on the left clearly shows the supposed 25,000 of thrust
generated by the lunar lander to arrest its descent. Yet in the
image on the right, where is the giant crater this would have
created? Looks like the complex web of NASA lies is about to unravel! |
Another
apparently inspirational image from the NASA archive. All seems
fine at first but notice the numerous directions in which the
shadows are falling (marked with arrows). This indicates that
the image is probably coposed of several images taken at different
times (probably in a top secret studio guarded by specially trained
aliens working as government agents) and joined together using
advanced technology NASA always denies existed at the time.
This is the photographic equivalent of an automotive "cut-and-shut"
job. If this image was your car, you wouldn't trust it to take
you to the end of your road without breaking in half! |
Not
much wrong with this picture you may think. Yet, by thinking that,
you would just become yet another of NASA's conspiracy victims.
Firstly, despite the absence of an atmosphere, no stars can be
seen in the sky.
Secondly, the interior of the shopping basket can clearly be seen
when all areas in shadow should be pitch black due to the absence
of air molecules.
Nice try NASA but we are not fooled that easily! |
Just
way too many things wrong with this picture!
Notice the absence of stars again.
The arrows indicate the various directions in which shadows are
falling, again showing evidence of inconsistent scene illumination.
Yet there is something even more obviously wrong with this picture.
If the length of the lower support column of the lunar lander
was 4 feet tall, this would indicate that the astronaut was over
8 feet tall, which none of the astronauts were.
Another careless mistake from NASA. |
Oh
yes NASA, it's all very well adding stars on this picture just
to make us realise how wrong we have been. We are not fooled so
easily!
If we look a bit more closely, we spot the constellation of Pegasus
with the planet Saturn (marked S1) clearly visible in the top
left corner. Yet at the time of the mission, although Saturn appeared
to be near Pegasus from Earth, from the Moon it would have
appeared to be in a completely different position (marked S2).
It is almost insulting to think that NASA could get away with
this obvious howler! |
Well,
with this image where does one begin?!
Inconsistent shadows, too much ambient light and incorrect planetary
positioning in the sky are all evident here.
Also notice how the focal length of the camera lens has changed
compared to the pictures above, even though the astronauts' Hasselblad
cameras were only fitted with a single type of prime lens.
Just how stupid did the NASA officials think the public were? |
Author
unknown. Repurposed from an e-mail for your viewing pleasure.
No NASA images were harmed in the making of this webpage.
|
|